Paul Montgomery (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} paradox0220) wrote,@ 2009-06-20 07:14:00 |
|
Anyone else with Time Warner cable modem seeing latency issues?
Last night it was sky high, this morning I'm seeing stuff like:
...
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=458 ttl=53 time=62.543 ms
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=459 ttl=53 time=55.939 ms
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=457 ttl=53 time=2793.204 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=458 ttl=53 time=2122.937 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=459 ttl=53 time=1413.484 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=460 ttl=53 time=661.052 ms
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=461 ttl=53 time=59.296 ms
...
--- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
465 packets transmitted, 459 packets received, +48 duplicates, 1% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 51.891/184.343/2793.204/427.977 ms
Hrm...
Last night it was sky high, this morning I'm seeing stuff like:
...
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=458 ttl=53 time=62.543 ms
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=459 ttl=53 time=55.939 ms
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=457 ttl=53 time=2793.204 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=458 ttl=53 time=2122.937 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=459 ttl=53 time=1413.484 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=460 ttl=53 time=661.052 ms
64 bytes from 69.147.114.224: icmp_seq=461 ttl=53 time=59.296 ms
...
--- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
465 packets transmitted, 459 packets received, +48 duplicates, 1% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 51.891/184.343/2793.204/427.977 ms
Hrm...
